- You stuck to the refinements we pointed out true enough. The character however now appears to be too comical -- is the hat needed?
- Also, on a more nit-picky level the house in the end scene is floating a little too high. You can see his feet as he emerges from the machine. Whoops. And also, it is a "he" -- which is also a potential problem.
the handle is more interactive now that it raises back up instead of disapearing. i think since you are exposing the character to the stuff that society consumes, the dude would of worked better as a younger boy instead of a man. Is it supose to be a quacker?
6 comments:
Feel that the characters at the ending scene can be a bit bigger? they are a bit too tight for my taste -- although you can argue otherwsie.
What about a character to be genderless? just some general thoughts.
- You stuck to the refinements we pointed out true enough. The character however now appears to be too comical -- is the hat needed?
- Also, on a more nit-picky level the house in the end scene is floating a little too high. You can see his feet as he emerges from the machine. Whoops. And also, it is a "he" -- which is also a potential problem.
looks good. I like the character though the gloves and hat seem somewhat unnecessary.
I love the new character. It ads an odd angle to it. Plants look better attached to the bottom of the screen.
I love the new Character, he looks like a Farmer (datz hot). He really sits well with the overall piece. And maybe making him a bit larger at the end.
the handle is more interactive now that it raises back up instead of disapearing. i think since you are exposing the character to the stuff that society consumes, the dude would of worked better as a younger boy instead of a man. Is it supose to be a quacker?
Post a Comment